You’re standing in line for a coffee. The guy at the
front of the line is told that one cup will run $8.
“What?”
he says. “Why so much?”
The
clerk just shrugs and smiles a little.
“What
about people who can’t afford $8. They just can’t have any?”
The
clerk just shrugs again.
“Is
there a reason you’re charging so much?”
The
clerk indicates the long line behind the man.
The
complainant turns and looks at the people behind him. “Don’t you all feel this
is a little much? $8 for a coffee.”
Another
person further down the line starts yelling and shaking his fist. He agrees
with the man at the front. He knocks over a magazine stand and utters a few
profanities.
Most
of the rest of those in line roll their eyes, study their shoes, mutter
something about “whackos and whiners.” A few insist on getting the line moving
because they can afford an $8 coffee, and to hell with anyone who can’t—that’s
their problem.
The
guy at the front tries to talk to some of the others, to tell them they should
be asking why it’s so much, to refuse to buy it until prices lower, but mostly,
they shift past him, pay the full price, and take pride in the fact that
they’re on their way to work and not wasting time complaining.
“There
was this nutcase at the cafe,” one says to his coworkers in the cubicle jungle.
He means the guy who knocked over the magazine stand, not the guy who was at
the front of the line.
I’ve
been very glad to see how much press the Occupy Movement has received, because
at least it’s getting out there. Sure, it took mainstream media a long time to
get on board, and the vast amount of what reporting I have heard has not been
able to hide its bias—or outright criticism—but at least the critical thinker
can make a decision on the messages he or she hears.
Sadly,
I’ve seen far too many people treating the Movement with apathy or open
hostility. I’ve found it that much more frustrating because many of those
criticising it claim to support many of its messages. Obviously the Movement
has come to be about the individuals in it rather than the group intent—too
bad.
Everyone
has a right to free speech, which is okay when you’re spouting your opinions
about hockey teams or sexy superstars on online media, but not if it’s
addressing an issue that might make you squirm when you think about how you
live your life. Good messages make us uncomfortable, but the immature person
avoids the message and focuses on the little criticism he has for the behaviour
of a select few. Concentrating all of his focus on this, he can say things
like, “I get what they’re trying to say, but this one guy downtown was [insert
criticism of distracting behaviour here] so I’ve found a reason to say the
whole Movement is flawed.”
The
Right (especially its media) gets openly hostile, calling the protesters lazy,
spoiled Arts students who just don’t have the gumption to get a real job and
make real money. These people are the most forgivable, really, because they
live in that sad, sad existence I’ve spoken of before where the pursuit of
money for its own sake is considered a reasonable existence. Pity them. Their
minds aren’t going to be changed.
The
1% is of course muddying the issue by focusing on “demands.”
“What
do you people want? What is the result of this you’d like to see?” The 1%, used
to dealing with labour unions, want to know what cheque they can write to end
this little dilemma, or what single idea they can ridicule. They don’t get that
the Occupiers are seeking to educate, to gather the strength of the remaining
voices that want to be heard and make one last push against greed.
The
remaining media always view protests that don’t involve striking workers as quaint.
“Oh look, they’re singing.” There’s always some panel that discusses the matter
and at some point, someone asks why they’re protesting if things are good.
Things
are not good, and they’re at risk of
getting very, very bad. These folks are attempting to highlight that which you
are trying to ignore: we can’t go on like this, politically, economically,
ecologically. You need to stop trusting the people who are getting rich off of
your failure to care.
Those
who mock the protesters—or who find the little examples they can criticize so
they needn’t listen to the overall messages—are doing so to deal with their 9-5
“go to work, buy stuff, go home, watch stuff” lifestyle. By criticizing those
who care—the people, not the message—they can justify not caring. Fighting for
the need to remain lazy and uncaring is starting to make you look like sheep.
I like hockey—I don’t write it off altogether
because I think Don Cherry should be taken off the air. I like movies—I don’t
write off Hollywood because they make sequels to bad flicks. I like coffee—I
don’t write off the drink just because I don’t like Starbucks’ business model. We
can choose what aspects of the message apply to us. I have friends in the
camps and friends in the towers and I can see things I disagree with in both. I
have chosen what I want to think based on what I’ve heard. I have not decided
the whole group—either group—is a wash because of one representative.
It
appears that those who claim to care are so very desperate to find a way to
hate the Movement, you’ve got to question if they DO care. Basing your whole
understanding of a movement on the actions of one person is like judging the
whole of literature by Danielle Steele.
Capitalism
is and always has been a faulty system. The desperation of those in the 1% to
get us to keep buying and to keep ignoring the facts and to keep thinking we
haven’t got any sort of power to threaten their spot at the top of the pyramid
is sad. You do not have to take part, you do not have to care. But you sure
as hell should think for a second about the greater objectives at hand when you
don’t like the look of the kid who got in the way of your latte purchase.
Hear, hear.
ReplyDeleteBravo, amigo. Bravo. Love the #OWS.
ReplyDeleteAll hail Guy Fawkes...Sic Semper Tyrannus....wait, wait....I'm getting carried away. Me? That's hardly ever been the case.
All 'isms' need to be put out of their misery, as all of them are based on the manipulative idea of infinite growth. I hear the death rattle of a pardigm that won't let go until the last resource, life, relationship, et al, have been decimated to feed the thirst at the very top. Hmm....sounds awfully Sith-like, eh!? Ha ha! The paradigm of: fiat currency, loaned into existence, from a private central bank, at interest, and then fractionally reserved at local banks must be sent to the glue factory. You know, just sayin'. Cheers! Keep 'em coming!