Thursday, April 29, 2010

Don't eff with the sacred queue


I’m coming back from Europe, early morning flight. Myself and one hundred other people. We’re leaving Barcelona at six, which means we’ve been up since three. We got to bed at midnight. Tempers are short on those that are conscious enough—after one of the worst airlines in the world—Alitalia—we still have jetlag and work to look forward to. Fun times.

Me being one of the responsible members of this trip, I’m at the back of the line, making sure everyone ahead of me gets through. There’s a single checkout counter operating, its clerk looking like he’s suffering from the revelries after last night’s Barcelona Football Club victory.

We’re not the only people flying to Rome this morning, though—we’re just the earliest. Soon, a line of another seventy or eighty people has formed behind us. None of them look pleased. They thought they’d given themselves plenty of time to get on this flight, now they see one hundred people who have to be processed before them.

My Spanish is passable enough—particularly my trucker vernacular—to gauge the extent of their collective displeasure.

I’m standing with another of the more responsible members of our group. He and I are discussing the speed of this line-up, and our own helplessness to do anything about it. We shrug. It is what it is.

A national, a young well-dressed Spaniard, his sweater tied about his shoulders, enters the main doors and assesses the line before him. He decides this is not for him and he proceeds to where I’m standing, right where the queue enters the mouse’s maze of ropeworks that allow a giant line to be folded upon itself leading up to the twenty check-in desks, one operating. Without looking at us, he edges between me and the other chaperone. We take exception.

“Excuse me,” I say, in English. “You trying to get in the line?”

“Si,” he says, beaming. I understand his dilemma.

“It starts there.” I point eighty people away to the line’s rear, ten feet from the door he entered.

He points to our group with an “Aw, c’mon” gesture.

“Forget it,” says my companion. “We’re not letting you ahead of any of these other people.”

A nod of approval from those behind us. No freebies, fella.

His face grows dark. He curses in Spanish, then turns abruptly, dragging his designer suitcase behind him.

“Thank you,” he spits over his shoulder.

“Nice sweater,” I send back.

The moral of this tale is not “The nerve of some people.” It’s “Why do we care?” We all made the flight, we all transferred in Rome. Mr. Sweater had several opportunities to glare at me and become angrier when I grinned back.

Is this sort of behaviour worth it? Is the queue such an icon of order that to mess with it is to throw all of society off balance?

I didn’t not let him in because of the people behind me. I didn’t let him in because he had the nerve to try to budge. Seriously, what were we trying to get to? A check-in counter followed by a wait followed by a gate—where more people tried to budge, incidentally.

Chalk it up to culture? No, despite their reputation, the Spanish are no ruder than the rest of us, they understand line-ups just as well.

We feel the need to crusade. He was rude, I was rude. We feel the need to stand up to each other in the most pointless situations. Guaranteed that guy mentioned to whoever he was meeting in Rome or wherever he went on to the jerk he ran into in Barcelona. Hell, he struck me enough to blog about him.

Do us any good? Nope.

What would’ve happened if I’d let him in? I’d have been behind one more person. Until everyone behind me saw me as the way in.

And would that have mattered? We all made the flight.

We put up a fight for the dumbest reasons.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

TV Enters the Museum of Irrelevance.


The same week that the CRTC announces that TV providers should be able to gouge Canadians, I read a report that says your average adult is watching far less of the boob-tube than in decades past. Funny. We're not watching less because we've rediscovered the world outside our doors or because there's been a resurgence in burying ourselves in the wonders of bound text (I was at a very depressing department meeting recently where we were shown some numbers of declining reading-rates in young people, and the repercussions).

No, indeed, we're watching less TV--that is, less of the actual machine called a television--because we're doing so much more of what you're doing right now: surfing and interacting with the Internet. No surprise there, I'm sure. The second article--the one reporting the decline in TV viewership was dubious in tone (strange, as it was print media mourning the decline of television) for it made out as if this transition is regrettable, a decline--like the loss wasn't so much of ratings but of that valued family interaction time where everybody gathers around to watch he who loses the biggest.

Oh, relax, my soapbox will remain stowed.

When I was in my early twenties, my TV consumption involved The Simpsons (I am a child of the 90s), some sports--chiefly hockey, token doses of Muchmusic, the channels Discovery, History and National Geography, and then bits and pieces of "what's on." I was not above mindless remote-flicking.

Then I moved to Taiwan, and though I still had some access to English-language television, it was often dated, always American, and usually out of sync with my teaching schedule. I just lost touch. I didn't even bother following anything online, and after a decade and a half, even my diligent Sunday-night pursuits of the yellow-skinned animated tomfoolery fell by the wayside.

When I came back to the land of Rick Mercer, Hannah Gartner and Don Cherry, I wasn't interested anymore. See, I had discovered what could be done with that time that's wasted at the TV. Still no soapbox: my wife has her shows and she's welcome to them, I mean that I simply can't sit still for an hour-long CSI. I still love my hockey, but often I'm doing something else while it's on. 'Cause let's face it, even the best games have some serious amounts of lettuce on the bun. Fortunately, when I returned to Canada, reality TV had really taken off and stupid was the order of the day. For the first six months I didn't even own a TV, and for at least a year after that I only had rabbit ears. I probably would still have the same 19-inch box my parents bought me in university if I didn't like taking in the odd movie--why can I stand movies? Enclosed narrative, no commercials, nobody addresses the foibles of other characters to the camera on Day 12.

I like that we have to interact with everything we access online, rather than just receive it. Oh yes, you're saying, "How much interacting is there in watching a Youtube montage of Family Guy fart gags set to 'Never Gonna Give You Up'?" But, c'mon, I don't want to beat up too much on the ugly stepchildren that are reality TV and professional sports, instead consider the drivel spewed out by your average sitcom or E-talk tripe. Interacting nothing--are you remembering to blink?

Yes, endless hours of anything is bad for you. "My name is Paul and I have a Wikipedia problem." I'm one of those guys who ends up reading about the South-Saharan tiger lily's pollination evolution and wondering how I got there from reading about the Quebec Act. But, the CRTC has basically approved price-gouging as what I see as a bailout technique. Sounds to me like the soon-to-be obsolete scratching at the walls as they slide.

Welcome, Television, to the Museum of Irrelevance. This display is entitled Media Crushed by the Internet, you'll find your spot between the Music Industry and the Newspaper.